레이블이 Sarasota County Technical Institute인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시
레이블이 Sarasota County Technical Institute인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시

2013년 11월 26일 화요일

오후 1:12

By Zada Max

In: , , , , , , ,

No comments

About 'technical institution'|...free secondary education, the introduction of technical colleges, the reform of mental and penal institutions, cottage homes for orphans...







About 'technical institution'|...free secondary education, the introduction of technical colleges, the reform of mental and penal institutions, cottage homes for orphans...








Ｗｏｍｅｎ'ｓ               ｈｅａｌｔｈ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ａ               ｌａｒｇｅ               ｆｏｃｕｓ               ｉｎ               ｏｕｒ               ｃｌａｓｓ.

Ｃｏｖｅｒｅｄ               ｉｎ               ｃｌａｓｓ               ｒｅａｄｉｎｇｓ,               ｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｉｏｎｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｆｉｌｍｓ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｍａｊｏｒ               ｐｒｏｂｌｅｍ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｔａｎｄｓ               ｏｕｔ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎ               ｉｍｐｌｅｍｅｎｔｉｎｇ               ｐｏｌｉｃｙ               ａｎｄ               ｐｒａｃｔｉｃｅ               ｏｎ               ｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌｌｙ               ｃｏｎｓｔｒｕｃｔｅｄ               ｉｄｅａｓ.

"Ｓｈｅ               ｉｓ               ａｌｓｏ               ｒｅｍｉｎｄｅｄ               ｉｎ               ｍｙｒａｉｄ               ｗａｙｓ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｏｔｅｎｔｉａｌ               ｄｅｆｅｃｔｉｖｅｎｅｓｓ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｂｉｒｔｈｉｎｇ               ｍａｃｈｉｎｅ"               (Ｄａｖｉｓ-Ｆｌｏｙｄ).

Ｔｈｅ               ｆｅｍａｌｅ               ｓｅｘ               ｏｒｇａｎｓ               ａｒｅ               ｓｅｅｎ               ａｓ               ｐｒｏｂｌｅｍａｔｉｃ               ａｎｄ               ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ               ｏｎｃｅ               ｃｈｉｌｄ               ｂｅａｒｉｎｇ               ｉｓ               ｏｖｅｒ.

Ｔｈｉｓ               ｈｏｓｔｉｌｉｔｙ,               ｏｒ               ｄｉｓｒｅｇａｒｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｏｍｅｎ'ｓ               ｂｏｄｉｅｓ               ｂｅｃｏｍｅｓ               ａ               ｄｉｓｒｅｇａｒｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｏｍｅｎ.

Ｍｉｃｈｅｌｌｅ               ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ               ｏｆ               Ｎｏｒｔｈ               Ｂｒａｎｆｏｒｄ,               Ｃｏｎｎ.

ｗａｓ               ｄｉａｇｎｏｓｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｅｕｄｉｏｍｅｔｒｉｃａｌ               ｓｔｒｏｍａｌ               ｓａｒｃｏｍａ,               ｔｙｐｅ               ｏｆ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ,               ｂｙ               ｈｅｒ               ｇｙｎｅｃｏｌｏｇｉｓｔ               Ｄｒ.

Ｓｃｏｔｔ               Ｃａｓｐｅｒ               ｗｏｒｋｉｎｇ               ｆｏｒ               Ｃａｓｐｅｒ               ａｎｄ               Ｃｏｕｎｔｙ               Ｏｂｓｔｅｔｒｉｃｓ.

Ｈｅ               ｓｕｇｇｅｓｔｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｅ               ｇｏ               ｔｏ               Ｄｒ.

Ｐｅｔｅｒ               Ｓｃｈｗａｒｔｚ               ｗｈｏ               ｗｏｒｋｅｄ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               Ｙａｌｅ-Ｎｅｗ               Ｈａｖｅｎ               Ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌ.

Ｔｈｅｙ               ｒｅｍｏｖｅｄ               ｈｅｒ               ｕｔｅｒｕｓ,               ｏｖａｒｉｅｓ,               ｆａｌｌｏｐｉａｎ               ｔｕｂｅｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｌｙｍｐｈ               ｎｏｄｅｓ.

Ａ               ｔｈｉｒｄ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒ,               ａ               ｆｉｒｓｔ               ｙｅａｒ               ｆｅｌｌｏｗ               Ｄｒ               Ｂａｂａｋ               Ｅｄｒａｋｉ,               ｒｅｍｏｖｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｙｍｐｈ               ｎｏｄｅｓ.

Ｙａｌｅ               ｐａｔｈｏｌｏｇｙ,               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ               ｓｐｏｋｅｓｐｅｒｓｏｎ               Ｔｈｏｍａｓ               Ｃｏｎｒｏｙ,               ｃｏｎｆｉｒｍｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｄｉａｇｎｏｓｉｓ.

ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ               ｈａｄ               ｓｉｇｎｉｆｉｃａｎｔ               ｎｅｒｖｅ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｌｅｆｔ               ｈｅｒ               ｉｎ               ｓｏ               ｍｕｃｈ               ｐａｉｎ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ｕｎａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｗａｌｋ               ｆｏｒ               ｍｏｎｔｈｓ               (Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ).

Ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ｔｏｌｄ               ｈｅｒ               ｓｙｍｐｔｏｍｓ               ｗｅｒｅ               ｆｒｏｍ               ａｎ               ｉｎａｂｉｌｉｔｙ               ｔｏ               ｔａｋｅ               ｅｓｔｒｏｇｅｎ               ａｓ               ｈｏｒｍｏｎｅ               ｒｅｐｌａｃｅｍｅｎｔ               ｔｈｅｒａｐｙ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ａ               "ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｓｕｒｖｉｖｏｒ"               (Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ).
               Ｉｎ               1997               ａ               Ｈａｒｖａｒｄ               ｐａｔｈｏｌｏｇｉｓｔ,               ｗｈｏ'ｓ               ｉｄｅｎｔｉｔｙ               ｉｓ               ｎｅｖｅｒ               ｒｅｖｅａｌｅｄ,               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｅ               ｎｅｖｅｒ               ｈａｄ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｔｉｓｓｕｅ               ｓａｍｐｌｅｓ               ｔａｋｅｎ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｈｅｒ               ｉｎ               1995               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｕｐｐｏｓｅｄｌｙ               ｃｏｎｔａｉｎｅｄ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｗａｓ               ｔｕｒｎｅｄ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｈｅｒ               ｂｙ               ｃｏｕｒｔ               ｏｒｄｅｒ               ｉｎ               2004.

Ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｐｌｅｓ               Ｙａｌｅ               ｕｓｅｄ               ａｓ               ａ               ｂａｓｉｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ｓｈｏｗｅｄ               ｎｏ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ.

Ｓｈｅ               ｓｕｅｄ               ｂｏｔｈ               Ｙａｌｅ               ａｎｄ               Ｃａｓｐｅｒ               ａｎｄ               Ｃｏｕｎｔｙ               Ｏｂｓｔｅｔｒｉｃｓ               ｉｎ               1997,               ｉｎ               2000               ｔｈｅ               ｊｕｒｙ               ｓｉｄｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               Ｙａｌｅ               ａｎｄ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｒｅａｃｈ               ａ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ               ａｇａｉｎｓｔ               Ｃａｓｐｅｒ               ａｎｄ               Ｃｏｕｎｔｙ               Ｏｂｓｔｅｔｒｉｃｓ.

Ａｐｐｅａｌｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔａｔｅ               Ｓｕｐｒｅｍｅ               Ｃｏｕｒｔ,               ｔｈｅ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ               ｆｏｒ               Ｙａｌｅ               ｗａｓ               ｒｅｖｅｒｓｅｄ               ｉｎ               2003               ｌｅａｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ａ               ｎｅｗ               ｔｒｉａｌ               ｌｅａｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｃｏｕｒｔ               ｏｒｄｅｒ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｐｌｅｓ.

Ｌａｓｔ               ｗｅｅｋ               ｉｎ               ａ               ｎｅｗ               ｔｒａｉｌ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ａｗａｒｄｅｄ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｏｖｅｒ               5               ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎ               ｄｏｌｌａｒｓ.
               Ｔｈｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｒｅｖｉｅｗｅｄ               ｖａｒｙ               ｌｉｔｔｌｅ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｏｒｙ,               ｂｕｔ               ｒｅｐｏｒｔｉｎｇ               ｓｔｙｌｅ               ｃｈａｎｇｅｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｎｎｅｒ               ｉｎ               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｔｏｒｙ               ｉｓ               ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｔｉｔｌｅｓ               ｏｆ               ｅａｃｈ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｇｉｖｅ               ａｗａｙ               ｍｏｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｂｉａｓ.

"Ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ,               Ｙａｌｅ               ｈｉｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               $5               ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ"               (Ｓｕｌｌｏ).

Ｗｅ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｗｈｙ               ｏｒ               ｈｏｗ,               ｂｕｔ               ｗｅ               ｋｎｏｗ               ｗｈｏ               ａｎｄ               ｈｏｗ               ｍｕｃｈ.

"Ｊｕｒｙ               Ａｗａｒｄｓ               $5.2               Ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎ               Ｆｏｒ               Ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               Ｗｏｍａｎ               Ｃａｌｌｓ               Ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ"               (Ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ               Ｐｒｅｓｓ).

"Ｃａｌｌｓ               Ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ"               ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｉｎｇ               ｔｒｅｎｄ               ｉｎ               ａｌｌ               ｔｈｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ:               ｓｈｅ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ,               ｓａｙｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｃａｌｌｓ.

Ｎｅｖｅｒ               ｉｓ               ｉｔ               ｓｈｏｗｎ               ａｓ               ｆａｃｔ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ
               ｃｏｍｐｌｅｔｅｌｙ               ｒｉｇｈｔ.

Ｓｈｅ               ｄｉｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｓｏ               ｗｈｙ               ｉｓ               ｉｔ               ｓｔｉｌｌ               ｈｅｒ               ｃａｌｌ.

Ｉｔ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏｗ               ｅｎｔｅｒｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅａｌｍ               ｏｆ               ｐｒｏｖｅｎ               ｆａｃｔ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｆｌｉｐ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｃａｌｌｉｎｇ               ｉｔ               ｕｎｎｅｅｄｅｄ               ｉｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｊｕｒｙ               ｆｉｎｄｉｎｇ               ｉｔ               ｓｏ,               "Ｊｕｒｙ               Ｆｉｎｄｓ               Ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               Ｕｎｎｅｅｄｅｄ               ｉｎ               Ｎｅｗ               Ｂｒａｎｆｏｒｄ               Ｃａｓｅ"               (ｎｂｃ30).

Ｏｎｃｅ               ｍｏｒｅ,               "Ｊｕｒｙ               ｆｉｎｄｓ               ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ"               (Ｃｏｘ).

Ｔｈｅ               Ｃｏｘ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｇｏｅｓ               ｏｎ               ｗｉｔｈ,               "Ａ               ｊｕｒｙ               ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅｄ               ａ               Ｎｏｒｔｈ               Ｂｒａｎｆｏｒｄ               Ｗｏｍａｎ'ｓ               ｓｔｏｒｙ..."               Ｉ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｆｅｅｌ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｎｅｅｄｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｈａｖｅ               ａ               ｊｕｒｙ               ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔ               ｆａｃｔｕａｌ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ.

Ｙｅｔ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｅ               ｗａｙ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｒｅａｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｊｕｒｙ               ｐｒｏｖｅｄ               ｏｒ               ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｔ               ｔｒｕｅ,               ｔｈｅ               ｔｒｕｔｈ               ｈａｓ               ｎｏ               ｏｂｊｅｃｔｉｖｉｔｙ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｍａｔｔｅｒ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｒｅａｓｏｎ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｎａｌ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｉｓ               ｂｉａｓｅｄ               ｒｉｇｈｔ               ａｗａｙ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｏｕｒｃｅ,               "Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ               ｔｏ               ａｐｐｅａｌ               ｍａｌｐｒａｃｔｉｃｅ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ"               (Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ).

Ｙａｌｅ               Ｄａｉｌｙ               Ｎｅｗｓ               ｆｏｃｕｓｅｓ               ｏｎ               ｗｈａｔ               Ｙａｌｅ               ｉｓ               ｄｏｉｎｇ               ｎｏｗ               ａｎｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｏｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｓｓｕｅ               ｏｒ               ｗｏｍａｎ               ｉｎ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ.

Ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｄｏ               ｃｏｖｅｒ               ａｌｌ               ｔｈｅ               ｓａｍｅ               ｆａｃｔｓ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｒｅｐｏｒｔｉｎｇ               ｓｔｙｌｅ               ｍａｋｅｓ               ｉｔ               ｓｅｅｍ               ｌｉｋｅ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｉｓ               ｊｕｓｔ               ａ               ｍｉｓｓｔｅｐ               ｔｈａｔ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｂｅ               ｃｏｒｒｅｃｔｅｄ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｕｔｕｒｅ.
               Ｃｏｘ'ｓ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｔａｌｋｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               Ｄｉｌｉｅｔｏ               ａｓ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｎｏ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｒｅａｌｌｙ               ｄｏｅｓ.

Ｓｈｅ               ｉｓ               ｑｕｏｔｅｄ               ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈｏｕｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｎｔｉｒｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ,               ｎｏｎｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ｑｕｏｔｅｓ               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｔｈｅｉｒ               ｗａｙ               ｉｎｔｏ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ.

"Ｉｆ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｇｉｖｅ               ｍｅ               ａｌｌ               ｍｙ               ｏｒｇａｎｓ               ｂａｃｋ               ａｎｄ               ｉｆ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｍａｋｅ               ｍｅ               ｗｈｏｌｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｗａｙ               Ｉ               ｗａｓ               ｔｅｎ               ｙｅａｒｓ               ａｇｏ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃｏｕｌｄ               ｔａｋｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｎｅｙ               ｂａｃｋ.

Ｂｕｔ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｃａｎ'ｔ               ｄｏ               ｔｈａｔ."               Ｓｈｅ               ｆｅｅｌｓ               ｌｉｋｅ               
               ａ               ｐｅｒｓｏｎ               ｈｅｒｅ,               ｗｅ               ｃａｎ               ｒｅｌａｔｅ               ｔｏ               ｈｅｒ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｑｕｏｔｅ.

Ｙｅｔ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｌｉｍｉｔ               ｈｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｓｈｏｒｔ               ｑｕｏｔｅｓ               ｏｒ               ｎｏ               ｑｕｏｔｅｓ               ａｔ               ａｌｌ.

Ｃｏｘ'ｓ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｗａｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｏｎｅ               ｔｏ               ａｌｓｏ               ｓａｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｍａｄｅ               ａ               ｍｉｓｔａｋｅ,               "Ａ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｍｉｓｔａｋｅ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｃｏｓｔ               Ｙａｌｅ               Ｓｃｈｏｏｌ               ｏｆ               Ｍｅｄｉｃｉｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｉｎｖｏｌｖｅｄ               ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎｓ               ｏｆ               ｄｏｌｌａｒｓ."               Ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｓｔ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｓｔｉｃｋ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ               ｏｆ               ｍａｌｐｒａｃｔｉｃｅ,               ａｌｌｅｇａｔｉｏｎｓ,               ａｎｄ               ｓｈｅ               ｓａｉｄ.
               Ｅｖｅｎ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｍａｔｔｅｒ               ｏｆ               ｈｅｒ               ｐｈｙｓｉｃａｌ               ｐａｉｎ               ａｆｔｅｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ａｌｓｏ               ａ               ｃｌａｉｍ               ｍａｄｅ               ｂｙ               ｈｅｒ               ａｎｄ               ｈｅｒ               ａｔｔｏｒｎｅｙ;               ｗｈｉｃｈ               ｉｓ               ｏｎｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｗｏ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               Ｓｔｅｖｅｎ               Ｅｃｋｅｒ               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ａｌｌ
               ｔｈｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｏｒ               Ｒｏｄｎｅｙ               Ｍａｒｇｏｌ               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ.

Ｎｅｒｖｅ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ｉｓ               ｄｅｔｅｃｔａｂｌｅ               ａｎｄ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｐｒｏｖｅｎ.

Ｅｍｏｔｉｏｎａｌ               ｓｔｒｅｓｓ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｃｌａｉｍ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｄｉｆｆｉｃｕｌｔ               ｔｏ               ｍｅａｓｕｒｅ.

Ｙｏｕ               ｃａｎ               ｓｅｅ               ｃｈａｒｔｓ               ｏｆ               ｎｅｒｖｅ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ａｎｄ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｃａｎ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍ               ｙｏｕ               ａｓ               ｔｏ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ａｎｄ               ｗｈｙ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｃａｕｓｉｎｇ               ｙｏｕ               ｐａｉｎ.

Ｔｈｒｅｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｓａｙ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｅ               ｓａｙｓ               ｓｈｅ               ｓｕｆｆｅｒｅｄ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ａｎｄ               ｐａｉｎ:               Ｓｕｌｌｏ,               Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ,               ａｎｄ               Ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ               Ｐｒｅｓｓ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｔｗｏ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｄｏ               ｎｏｔ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｃｏｖｅｒ               ｔｈａｔ               ｆａｃｔ.

Ｓｕｌｌｏ               ａｌｓｏ               ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｑｕｏｔｅ,               "Ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               44               ｙｅａｒｓ               ｏｌｄ,               ａｎｄ               ｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅｌｙ               ｓｕｆｆｅｒｅｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｓｙｍｐｔｏｍｓ               ｏｆ               ｍｅｎｏｐａｕｓｅ,               ｓｈｅ               ｓａｉｄ"               (Ｓｕｌｌｏ).

Ｉ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｌｉｋｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｉｎｋ               ｔｈｅ               ｗｏｍａｎ               ｋｎｏｗｓ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｓｈｅ               ｉｓ               ｇｏｉｎｇ               ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ               ｍｅｎｏｐａｕｓｅ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｔ               ｃａｎ               ｂｅ               ｅａｓｉｌｙ               ｄｉａｇｎｏｓｅｄ.

Ｔｈｅ               Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅ               ｓａｙｓ               ｓｈｅ               ｒｅｔｕｒｎｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ               ｏｆ               ｐａｉｎ               ａｎｄ               ｗａｓ               ｔｏｌｄ               ｉｔ               ｗａｓ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ａ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｓｕｒｖｉｖｏｒ.

Ｄｏｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｎｏｔ               ｐｒｏｖｅ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｗａｓ               ｐａｉｎ,               ｔｈｅ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｇａｖｅ               ｈｅｒ               ａｎ               ａｎｓｗｅｒ               ｔｏ               ｈｅｒ               ｃｌａｉｍ.
               "Ｔｈｅ               ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌ               ｉｔｓｅｌｆ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｈｉｇｈｌｙ               ｓｏｐｈｉｓｔｉｃａｔｅｄ               ｔｅｃｈｎｏｃｒａｔｉｃ               ｆａｃｔｏｒｙ;               ｔｈｅ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｅｃｈｎｏｌｏｇｙ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌ               ｈａｓ               ｔｏ               ｏｆｆｅｒ,               ｔｈｅ               ｂｅｔｔｅｒ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｃｏｎｓｉｄｅｒｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ"               (Ｄａｖｉｓ-Ｆｌｏｙｄ,               329).

Ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｌｍ               Ｂｏｒｎ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               Ｕ.Ｓ.Ａ.

ｔｈｅ               ｆｉｌｍ               ｓｈｏｗｅｄ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｄｏｉｎｇ               ｔｈｉｎｇｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｎｏ               ｒｅａｓｏｎ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ｔｈａｎ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｔｓ               ｄｏｎｅ               ｔｈａｔ               ｗａｙ.

Ｉｆ               ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌｓ               ａｒｅ               ｔｅｃｈｎｏｃｒａｔｉｃ               ｆａｃｔｏｒｉｅｓ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｏｆ               ｃｏｕｒｓｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｔｅｃｈｎｉｃａｌ               ｅｘｐｅｒｔｓ               ａｒｅ               ｎｏｔ               ｔｏ               ｂｅ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎｅｄ,               ａｆｔｅｒ               ａｌｌ               ｔｈｅｙ               ａｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｐｅｒｔｓ               ｉｆ               ｗｅ               ｑｕｅｓｔｉｏｎ               ｔｈｅｍ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｗｈｅｒｅ               ａｒｅ               ｗｅ               ｔｏ               ｇｅｔ               ｏｕｒ               ａｎｓｗｅｒｓ?

Ｙｅｔ               ｏｎｃｅ               ｗｅ               ｌｏｏｋ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｃｏｒｄｓ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｐｒｏｆｅｓｓｉｏｎ               ｉｓ               ｎｏｔ               ａｓ               ｏｂｊｅｃｔｉｖｅ               ａｓ               ｗｅ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｌｉｋｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｉｎｋ.

"ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ               ｓａｉｄ               ｓｈｅ               ｎｅｖｅｒ               ｒｅｃｅｉｖｅｄ               ａｎ               ａｐｏｌｏｇｙ               ｆｏｒ               ｗｈａｔ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｈｅｒ.

Ｔｈｅｙ               ｗｅｒｅ               ａｌｌ               ｖｅｒｙ               ａｒｒｏｇａｎｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｒｅｇａｒｄ               ｔｏ               ｍｅ,               ｓｈｅ               ｓａｉｄ"               (Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ).

Ｊｕｓｔ               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ａ               ｂａｄ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｔ               ｃｏｍｅｓ               ｏｆｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｌｉｎｅ               ｄｏｅｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｍｅａｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｆａｃｔｏｒｙ               ｉｓ               ａｔ               ｆａｕｌｔ,               ｂｅｃａｕｓｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｎｅｓ               ｒｕｎｎｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅ               ｆａｃｔｏｒｙ               ａｒｅ               ｔｈｅ               ｅｘｐｅｒｔｓ               ｗｈｉｌｅ               ｙｏｕ               ａｒｅ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｃｌａｉｍｉｎｇ               ｓｏｍｅｔｈｉｎｇ               ｔｈｅｙ               ａｒｅ               ｍａｒｋｅｄ               ａｓ               ａｎ               ｅｘｐｅｒｔ.

Ｔｈｉｓ               ｗｏｍａｎ               ｈａｓ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｐｒｏｖｅｎ               ｒｉｇｈｔ               ｙｅｔ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｓｔｉｌｌ               ｔｈｅ               ｃａｓｅ               ｏｆ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ               ａｎｄ               ｓａｙ-ｓｏ               ｖｓ.

ｅｘｐｅｒｔ               ｏｐｉｎｉｏｎｓ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌ.
               Ｔｈｅ               ｊｕｒｙ               ａｌｓｏ               ａｗａｒｄｅｄ               ａｎ               ａｄｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌ               $700,00               ｆｏｒ               ｍｅｎｔａｌ               ａｎｇｕｉｓｈ               ｄｕｅ               ｔｏ               ｈｅｒ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｆａｉｌｕｒｅ               ｔｏ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍ               ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ               ｔｈａｔ               ｓｈｅ               ｄｉｄ               ｎｏｔ               ａｃｔｕａｌｌｙ               ｈａｖｅ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ.

Ｓｏｍｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｃｏｖｅｒ               ａｄｄｉｔｉｏｎａｌ               ａｎｇｕｉｓｈ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔ               ｓｔａｔｅｍｅｎｔｓ               ｆｒｏｍ               ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ,               "Ｉ               ｆｅｌｔ               ｖｉｏｌａｔｅｄ..."               (Ｃｏｘ).

Ｉｎ               ｔｈｅ               ｏｔｈｅｒ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ               ｎｏ               ｐａｉｎ               ｉｓ               ｅｘｐｒｅｓｓｅｄ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｆｒｏｍ               ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ａｌｌ               ａ               ｃｌａｉｍ               ａｎｄ               ｎｏｔ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｄｉｒｅｃｔｌｙ               ｑｕｏｔｅｄ               ｆｒｏｍ               ｈｅｒ.

Ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｅｉｔｈｅｒ               ｐａｓｓｅｄ               ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ               ｈｅｒ               ｌａｗｙｅｒ               ｏｒ               "ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ."               Ｔｈｉｓ               ｃａｓｅ               ｓｅｅｍｓ               ｈａｌｆ               ａｂｏｕｔ               ｈｕｍａｎ               ｓｕｆｆｅｒｉｎｇ               ｔｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｍａｒｇｉｎａｌｉｚｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｃｌａｍｓ,               ｓｅｃｏｎｄ               ｈａｎｄ               ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ               ｔｈｒｏｕｇｈ               ｈｅｒ               ｌａｗｙｅｒ,               ａｎｄ               ａｃｃｏｒｄｉｎｇ               ｔｏ               ｓｔａｔｅｍｅｎｔｓ.

Ｅｖｅｎ               ａｆｔｅｒ               ｉｔ               ｉｓ               ｐｒｏｖｅｎ               ｓｈｅ               ｈａｄ               ａｎ               ｏｐｅｒａｔｉｏｎ               ｗｈｅｎ               ｏｎｅ               ｗａｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｎｅｅｄｅｄ               ａｎｄ               ｓｕｆｆｅｒｅｄ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ｎｏｔｅｄ               ｂｙ               ｈｅｒ               ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｉｓ               ｎｏ               ｏｕｔｒａｇｅ.

Ｆｅｍａｌｅ               ｈｅａｌｔｈ               ｉｓｓｕｅｓ               ｔｈａｔ               ｒｅｌａｔｅ               ｔｏ               ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｐｒｏｄｕｃｔｉｖｅ               ｏｒｇａｎｓ               ａｒｅ               ａ               ｔａｂｏｏ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ               ｉｎ               ｗｅｓｔｅｒｎ               ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ,               ｒｅｆｅｒｒｅｄ               ｔｏ               ｏｎｌｙ               ａｓ               "ｆｅｍａｌｅ               ｐｒｏｂｌｅｍｓ."               Ｉｆ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｓｕｂｊｅｃｔ               ｗａｓ               ｎｏｔ               ｓｏ               ｔａｂｏｏ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｔｈｅｒｅ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔｉｖｅ               ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ               ｉｎ               ｔｈｅｓｅ               ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓ.

Ｈａｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｆｏｕｎｄ               ｉｎ               ｓａｙ               ｈｅｒ               ｒｉｇｈｔ               ｋｉｄｎｅｙ               ａｎｄ               ｂｅｅｎ               ｒｅｍｏｖｅｄ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｔｏ               ｆｉｎｄ               ｌａｔｅｒ               ｓｈｅ               ｗａｓ               ｃａｎｃｅｒ               ｆｒｅｅ,               ｗｅ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｈａｖｅ               ｓｏｍｅ               ｏｕｔｒａｇｅ.

Ｔｈｅ               ｒｅｐｏｒｔｅｒｓ               ｗｏｕｌｄ               ｃａｒｒｙ               ａ               ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔｉｖｅ               ｔｏｎｅ               ａｎｄ               ｍｉｇｈｔ               ｅｖｅｎ               ｒｅｍｏｖｅ               ｃｌａｉｍｓ               ｗｉｔｈ               ｆｉｎｄｉｎｇｓ               ｏｒ               ｆａｃｔ.
               Ｔｈｉｓ               ｓｔｏｒｙ               ｉｓ               ａ               ｐｒｉｍｅ               ｅｘａｍｐｌｅ               ｏｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎ'ｓ               ｂｌａｔａｎｔ               ｄｉｓｒｅｇａｒｄ               ｆｏｒ               ａ               ｍｉｓｔａｋｅ               ｔｈｅｙ               ｍａｄｅ               ａｎｄ               ｔｈｅ               ｄａｍａｇｅ               ｉｔ               ｃａｕｓｅｄ.

Ｉｆ               ｔｈｅ               ｍｅｄｉｃａｌ               ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｔｙ               ｒｅｇａｒｄｅｄ               ｗｏｍｅｎ'ｓ               ａｎａｔｏｍｉｅｓ               ａｓ               ｍｏｒｅ               ｔｈａｎ               ｊｕｓｔ               ｖｅｓｓｅｌｓ               ｆｏｒ               ｃｈｉｌｄｒｅｎ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｔｈｉｓ               ｍｉｇｈｔ               ｈａｖｅ               ｎｏｔ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ.

Ｏｎｃｅ               ａ               ｃｕｌｔｕｒｅ               ｇｉｖｅｓ               ｐｏｗｅｒ               ｔｏ               ａｎ               ｉｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｉｏｎ               ｏｖｅｒ               ｎａｔｕｒｅ               ａｎｄ               ｗｈａｔ               ｉｓ               ｂｅｓｔ               ｆｏｒ               ｔｈｅ               ｐｅｏｐｌｅ               ｔｈｅｎ               ｉｔ               ｗｉｌｌ               ｐｒｏｄｕｃｅ               ｇｒｏｓｓ               ｎｅｇｌｉｇｅｎｃｅ               ｌｉｋｅ               ｗｈａｔ               ｈａｐｐｅｎｅｄ               ｔｏ               Ｍｓ.

ＤｉＬｉｅｔｏ.

Ｗｏｍｅｎ               ｎｏｔ               ｏｎｌｙ               ｄｅｓｅｒｖｅ               ｂｅｔｔｅｒ               ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ,               ｂｕｔ               ａｌｌ               ｔｒｅａｔｍｅｎｔ               ｇｉｖｅｎ               ｓｈｏｕｌｄ               ｂｅ               ａｂｌｅ               ｔｏ               ｗｉｔｈｓｔａｎｄ               ａｃａｄｅｍｉｃ               ｅｘａｍｉｎａｔｉｏｎ.
               Ｗｏｒｋｓ               Ｃｉｔｅｄ
               Ａｓｓｏｃｉａｔｅｄ               Ｐｒｅｓｓ.

"Ｊｕｒｙ               Ａｗａｒｄｓ               $5.2               Ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎ               Ｆｏｒ               ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               Ｗｏｍａｎ               Ｃａｌｌｓ               Ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ."               Ｃｏｕｒａｎｔ.ｃｏｍ               11               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

.
               Ｃｏｘ,               Ｅｒｉｎ.

"Ｊｕｒｙ               ｆｉｎｄｓ               ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               ｕｎｎｅｃｅｓｓａｒｙ."               ＷＴＮＨ.ｃｏｍ               11               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

.
               Ｄａｖｉｓ-Ｆｌｏｙｄ,               Ｒｏｂｂｉｅ               Ｅ.

"Ｔｈｅ               Ｒｉｔｕａｌｓ               ｏｆ               Ａｍｅｒｉｃａｎ               Ｈｏｓｐｉｔａｌ               Ｂｉｒｔｈ."               "Ｃｏｎｆｏｒｍｉｔｙ               ａｎｄ               Ｃｏｎｆｌｉｃｔ:               Ｒｅａｄｉｎｇｓ               ｉｎ               Ｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌ               Ａｎｔｈｒｏｐｏｌｏｇｙ."               Ｅｄ.

Ｄａｖｉｓ               ＭｃＣｕｒｄｙ.

Ｎｅｗ               Ｙｏｒｋ,               ＮＹ:               ＨａｒｐｅｒＣｏｌｌｉｎｓ,               1994.

323-340.
               Ｓｉｅｇｅｌ,               Ｓｔｅｖｅｎ.

"Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ               ｔｏ               ａｐｐｅａｌ               ｍａｌｐｒａｃｔｉｃｅ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ."               Ｙａｌｅ               Ｄａｉｌｙ               Ｎｅｗｓ               15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

.
               Ｓｕｌｌｏ,               Ｍｉｃｈｅｌｌｅ               Ｔｕｃｃｉｔｔｏ.

"Ｄｏｃｔｏｒｓ,               Ｔａｌｅ               Ｈｉｔ               ｗｉｔｈ               $5               ｍｉｌｌｉｏｎ               ｖｅｒｄｉｃｔ."               Ｎｅｗ               Ｈａｖｅｎ               Ｒｅｇｉｓｔｅｒ               11               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

.
               "Ｊｕｒｙ               Ｆｉｎｄｓ               Ｈｙｓｔｅｒｅｃｔｏｍｙ               Ｕｎｎｅｅｄｅｄ               Ｉｎ               Ｎｅｗ               Ｂｒａｎｆｏｒｄ               Ｃａｓｅ."               ｎｂｃ30.ｃｏｍ               11               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.

15               Ｎｏｖ.

2005.
               .






Image of technical institution






technical institution
technical institution


technical institution Image 1


technical institution
technical institution


technical institution Image 2


technical institution
technical institution


technical institution Image 3


technical institution
technical institution


technical institution Image 4


technical institution
technical institution


technical institution Image 5


  • Related blog with technical institution





    1. sarkariniyukti.blogspot.com/   04/05/2012
      HUDCO - India's Premier techno-technical institution in the field of Hosuing and Urban Infrastructure Development established in 1970, a...
    2. noemptyspace.blogspot.com/   12/15/2006
      ..., which is probably why he heaps more praise on technical institutions than management institutions. I have one simple question...
    3. newsrecipesworld.blogspot.com/   07/30/2012
      ...of Principal, Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor (Technical and Non Technical) in various Govt. Colleges and Institutions - Last date August 30, 2012' Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) Recruitment of Principal, Professor...
    4. iitplacements.wordpress.com/   12/30/2010
      AICTE (All Indian Council of Technical Education) has took... on the decision of the Technical institutes before and From...
    5. writingcenterjournal.blogspot.com/   10/15/2005
      ...lot from the director of technical writing at my last institution (some of the technical writing stuff can really come in handy when you’re writing...
    6. comradetweek.blogspot.com/   01/15/2006
      ...free secondary education, the introduction of technical colleges, the reform of mental and penal institutions, cottage homes for orphans...
    7. plec.blogspot.com/   04/02/2004
      ..., supply-chain management and technical support for frontline troops; and, of...ideologically schizophrenic Brookings Institution . Private military corporations (PMCs...
    8. ciccmslibrary.blogspot.com/   03/15/2004
      ...communication. Are the librarians happy with the level of integration at their institutions? no - but it's not IT, it is more issues with faculty Content rights...
    9. mochassid.blogspot.com/   10/05/2008
      ...to Next Point if You Have No Interest In Technical Points} Another little ...legislation is the ability of financial institutions to suspend adherence to FAS 157 which...
    10. thelookingglass.blogspot.com/   03/16/2008
      ...one called the TAF, for depository institutions, and has announced...ordinarily deal directly with at all --- with some technical safeguards .) And when the panic...

      11. Technical Institution - Blog Homepage Results

      Technical WorkshopsbyVivekanandan Manokaran - Software Engineer
      http://technicalworkshops.blogspot.com/
      ... about the Technical Workshops that ... by various institutions and organisations
      Stocks And Commodities Trading Marketbystocks-commodities-trading
      http://stocks-commodities-trading.blogspot.com/
      ...market analysis,and computerized technical analysis of stocks and ...theory and trading educational institutions.
      IEM CETDbyIEM CETD
      http://iemcetd.blogspot.com/
      Chemical Engineering Technical Division, Institution of Engineers Malaysia
      more Technical Institution Blogs



    Related Video with technical institution







    technical institution Video 1








    technical institution Video 2








    technical institution Video 3




    technical institution